[ SECRET POST #3382 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: BOOK CLUB - PLEASE READ

[diet_poison]

Maybe but I'm not sure how to avoid situations like this even if that's true, other than instituting a minimum word count or some other parameters for future recs.

I asked the anon who nominated it if it was a serious rec, and they said it was. Other than having pre-set parameters, there isn't any way for me to reject properly-submitted recs while still being impartial. Maybe they were lying, but how can I know that for sure? If I rejected it because I thought they were trolling, it'd be pretty unfair.