[ SECRET POST #3389 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #484.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm primarily a fan of the books and read the books long before the movies, definitely love the books more, but tbh I thought movie Elrond was more interesting and...how do I say...more tangible, had a more distinct shape, I guess? than book Elrond, at least given how the story had to be adapted to the screen (a movie cannot involve a narrated appendix entry after the fact.) I liked Elrond a lot in the book but if they had been totally faithful to the book while adapting him to the screen he would have been boring and forgettable as shit and I think the movie version was wonderfully memorable and distinctive even if it wasn't totally faithful. Faithfulness is a really overrated and fairly useless quality all by itself.

[(Anonymous)]

Who said anything about being faithful to the book? Because I didn't. I don't need faithfulness, so your holier-than-thou lecture is misplaced. There's no such thing as one way to adapt a book into a movie. What they made isn't inherently the only way to do it or even the best way to do it. Elrond in the films was shitty and uninteresting.

[silverr]

Elrond in the films was shitty and uninteresting.

Okay, for you, but obviously not to the AYRT (or to me for that matter; I also enjoyed Weaving. For me he had gravitas.)

[(Anonymous)]

da

that didn't read at all like a holier-than-thou lecture, wtf

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

someone is definitely grumpier-than-thou!

[(Anonymous)]

DA

What "holier than thou" attitude? Gosh, you are touchy.