[ SECRET POST #3393 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3393 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Arguments you hate

[(Anonymous)]

Arguments that attempt to invalidate someone's opinion by hypothetically changing some variable about the topic and proposing that their opinion would be different if that variable were true.

Fandom example: "You say you hate her because she cries too much, but if she were a man she'd be your precious woobie baby!" (Therefore your hate is based in sexism and is invalid.)

Doesn't work because you can't prove a hypothetical and because sometimes changing the variable changes the situation completely so of course their opinion would be different.

Re: Arguments you hate

[(Anonymous)]

With this one, I think it would depend on how well the people know each other. Like in your fandom example, if I know that my friend loves more emotional men, and loves seeing them cry, reading hurt/comfort about them, etc. but they say they hate a female character solely because she cries a lot, then that fandom argument you gave becomes valid in my opinion. because there is enough context to assume the hypothetical could easily be correct. Obviously, if I am just making a random hypothetical about someone who I don't know, this point doesn't work as well.