Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-04-20 06:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #3395 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3395 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-20 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Writing question / mythology question
Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-20 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)Are you infact just assuming that I just didn't know enough? Are you just assuming that because I said I didn't want to use them the same way discworld used them that what I actually meant was that they belong to discworld and never existed before then?
I mean, it seems like you're just taking the dumbest interpretation of what I said so that you could come along and correct me for something I didn't actually say.
Re: Writing question / mythology question
It seems pretty cut and dry to me. I mean, if that's not how you intended it then no problem -- and I'd rather not continue this discussion considering I thought it concluded nicely downthread.
Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 12:01 am (UTC)(link)It seems to me you were assuming stupidity or ignorance where no such assumption was warranted.
Like If I had been talking about needing a romantic figure for a YA fantasy love story, and someone suggested Vampire, and I had said "The thought did occur, but I don't want to drift too closely to Twilight." would you feel the need to talk down to me about how twilight didn't invent vampires?
Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 12:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Writing question / mythology question
Re: Writing question / mythology question
I'm willing to admit the possibility that I colossally misread you, and I apologize for that. But you're making bad-faith assumptions about how I came to the conclusion I did and I'm not having it.
Re: Writing question / mythology question
Re: Writing question / mythology question
Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 12:27 am (UTC)(link)"Well, this person mustn't know where golems come from, let me be deliberately insulting to them with no valid reason for assuming their ignorance?" no, 1.) you have zero right to complain about how I interperate your assumptions about me, when you yourself are assuming the worst interpretation of what I said without any justification. That phrasing got messy so let me clarify: we're both making uncharitable assumptions about the other and neither of us hold the high ground there and you can 'have that' or not, but it's the way it is. And 2.) You have zero right to complain about "bad faith" when your reaction to said assumptions about me was to be deliberately insulting. You didn't earn good faith.
You apologised for being deliberately insulting, but then continued along with the same insulting assumption and tried to justify it, which sort of invalidated the apology. "I'm sorry for being mean, but I was right about you" is not an apology.
Re: Writing question / mythology question
Re: Writing question / mythology question
(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 12:32 am (UTC)(link)Tied myself up with that one.