case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-20 06:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #3395 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3395 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I still rewatch this sometimes. I love Defying Gravity so much, and knowing where the showrunner planned to take it just makes me miss it even more.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-21 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Oooh, do tell more! It bugged me so much when it ended without any explanation about the artefacts and why one of the crew couldn't seen them.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-22 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
"How Defying Gravity would have progressed, straight from the creator" at CliqueClack:

http://cliqueclack.com/tv/2009/10/29/how-defying-gravity-would-have-progressed-straight-from-the-creator/

Verrry interesting reading. :)

(Anonymous) 2016-04-22 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT
Thank you for the reply, it indeed is very interesting reading!
(For some reason my browser refuses to go to that site, and wayback is no help because there is a robots.txt that forbids indexing, so I did a websearch with the title of the article and found copies of it elsewhere.)