case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-21 05:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #3396 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3396 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Robert DeNiro]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-22 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
It's not anti-censorship to NOT want to spread false medical information, though. Look at it this way-- it would be highly irresponsible of me to claim that rubbing toads on your junk will cure cancer. I'm not a doctor, I've done no studies that support this. If people were desperate enough to believe me, my misinformation could end up killing people who rub toads on their junk instead of seeing a real doctor and getting chemo.

Not giving me a wide platform from which I could spread my false information isn't censorship. It'd be not allowing someone to yell 'fire' in a crowded building when there is no fire.