Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-04-23 03:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #3398 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3398 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #486.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)Not that I'm challenging you on this, I totally believe you that he's a serial abuser, I just want details.
Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)Here is your jumping on point to the DC trainwreck.
Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
When they were kind of dancing around naming him I thought it was Scott Lobdell based on his behavior at a con a couple years ago, but apparently even Lobdell has his limits. Though Berganza's position explains SO MUCH about the direction Superman's been going for the last several years.
Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)I mean, he is, absolutely. He's complete scum and needs to be gone, but if all you know is his name and someone online thinks he's an abuser, you really ought to look into things before jumping on the band wagon.
Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DC comics still protecting serial abuser Eddie Berganza
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)