fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3425 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3425 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

[Final Fantasy VII/Super Smash Bros]

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

[The Girls Next Door, Bridget Marquardt, Holly Madison, Kendra Wilkinson]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Pokémon Sun and Moon]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Love and Lies]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Aoishiro]

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

[The Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________

09. [SPOILERS for Houdini and Doyle]

__________________________________________________

10. [SPOILERS for Pokemon SM]

__________________________________________________

11. [SPOILERS for The Witcher/Dragon Age]

__________________________________________________

12. [SPOILERS for Cupid]
[WARNING for rape, incest]

__________________________________________________

13. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

["Blurred Lines", Robin Thicke]

Notes:

Really early because I've got stuff to do, sorry about that.

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

"Intelligence and tool usage does not mean we situation. magic communicate."

Uh... what now?

Yep, it's hypothetical situation that begins with the assumption you CAN talk with any animal you choose, so your scenario that every animal would be unlikely to understand humans makes no sense at all. Even aside from the fact that there are already, IRL, animals which communicate with human beings and can grasp abstract concepts.

This discussion has been odd. It's as if someone asked "If you had the ability to fly like Superman, where would you go?" and someone came in going, "But no human being can fly on their own, without the aid of some other device, etc. etc." I mean, that's correct, but it's also being a pedant and a killjoy.

My fucking phone did that. It kept jumping around and throwing words around. Let me rewrite it using a real keyboard. :P

"Intelligence and tool usage does not mean we can communicate.

Apes that communicate with sign language have been pretty controversial. There is a lot of interpreter bias.

Also, this is a hypothetical, magical situation."

And yeah, I agree with the rest. This is just some fun hypothetical question. No idea why my comment was the one chosen to have this argument over a silly question.

Edited 2016-05-21 03:08 (UTC)

nayrt but pretty sure it's because you made a blanket statement about how no animals can understand abstract concepts and are ignoring all evidence to the contrary, when the only support you can drum up is your line about interpreter bias. Not all indications of animal intelligence/communication involves sign language, but hey, it's clearly all you've got.

I actually never said that. Nor was it in my initial comment that started the whole conversation. =)

[ SECRET POST #3425 ]

Re: You can talk to any species of animal.

Re: You can talk to any species of animal.

Re: You can talk to any species of animal.

Re: You can talk to any species of animal.