Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-21 03:23 pm
[ SECRET POST #3426 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3426 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Renaud (French singer)]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-21 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Most women probably wouldn't think it were romantic if just any guy did it, no. These aren't really interchangeable ideas with "some bozo off the street" vs. Edward Cullen or Christian Grey doing it.
And that BDSM characterization is perfectly fine, for a cheap sex fantasy novel.
Re: Interesting secret thread
The problem is people absolutely do believe it and that's not healthy.
'The only reason he likes BDSM is because he's broken and he can be fixed' is horrible for any novel when BDSM has so little positive focus in media or fiction.
Re: Interesting secret thread
Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-21 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)I just don't think it was 50 Shade's job to be an educational manual on BDSM, and I think people have pushed responsibility and blame on a dumb erotic novel when they should realize it's just a dumb erotic novel. I can understand the frustration that 50 Shades has perhaps popularized BDSM, and in a way that actually shows unhealthy dynamics, but I think it's important to treat these kinds of books for what they are and not act like they are failed mouthpieces for any sort of agenda beyond being romantic/erotic trash novels.
Re: Interesting secret thread
Re: Interesting secret thread
Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-21 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)I wonder why there isn't such scrutiny for people who like books/movies that contain any amount of violence.
Anyway, in the end, it's not your place to assume why someone enjoys something and I think it is ridiculously puritan to enforce your views on other people and shit on their parade.
Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-22 12:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-22 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Exactly! But it seems women always want to believe the worst of each other.
Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-22 12:36 am (UTC)(link)Thank you for this comment. It's not just puritanical. It's condescending as fuck. Oh gee, all those stupid women, how will they ever know what constitutes a healthy relationship if they can't figure out that cheap, silly BDSM novels aren't for real?
Re: Interesting secret thread
Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-22 01:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Interesting secret thread
(Anonymous) 2016-05-22 12:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Interesting secret thread
Yes, it's totally puritan to want people to practice BDSM in a healthy way. I'll just be over here in my buckled shoes.