Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-23 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #3428 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3428 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Blizzard are trying to combat Overwatch porn.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-23 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)Thing that really grinds my gears tho, is the Zarya thing. So Anita Sarkeesian rightly calls them out on the fact that all of their women look like porn stars, and even the best armour is still ridiculously sexualized. So what do they do? The throw out Zarya, who should have been an awesome character, Hell, she should have been the main character instead of fucking tracer, but they throw her out there, like "Hey, OK, here's a ugly chick for you, can you stop being a bitch now".
I will never forgive them for that.
Re: Blizzard are trying to combat Overwatch porn.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Blizzard are trying to combat Overwatch porn.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 12:57 am (UTC)(link)*sigh* I don't know why I'm even replying to this. You're probably just another of the many, many antifeminist trolls on this comm trying to make feminists look thin-skinned and reactionary.
Re: Blizzard are trying to combat Overwatch porn.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:28 am (UTC)(link)