case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-24 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3429 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3429 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: (Default)

Re: How's your labia?

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-05-25 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe I would too if he hadn't said "I'm not sure". I take that as a neutral stance; neither confirming nor denying. It simply introduces the possibility that the stance may be wrong: it doesn't argue that it IS wrong.

A critical response would be "You shouldn't take a personal surgeon's definition as gospel".

Re: How's your labia?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-25 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
I disagree. I think an uncritical response wouldn't introduce any kind of doubt or implication that the stance is unhealthy. It would just present the stance without comment.