Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-24 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #3429 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3429 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
And no, Clint/Coulson is not comparable because compared to that ship, Kylo and Hux definitely have more canon interaction to fall back on, no matter how much you want to deny it.
And yay, falling back on the old "white cocks waah" whine.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-25 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)Kylo apologists make sense to me in Star Wars fandom; I mean, Darth Vader was redeemed before he died. The only canon that I can think of that is more forgiving to its characters' villainy is Naruto.
Speaking as someone in the Reylo part of the fandom, a lot of the excuses I see for Kylo Ren are of two types: an overreaction to anti-Reylo criticisms and/or people who point out that Kylo's crimes are not as extensive as others try to make them out to be. I don't see blind devotion "Kylo Ren did nothing wrong" posts except as a joke.
no subject
The main thing I have seen was a number of Kylo fans do this thing that is very reminiscent of the "Loki was brainwashed as well during the Avengers and thus is not to blame": "Kylo was brainwashed by Snoke when he killed the other apprentices."
Considering the movie mentions Snoke having been kinda sorta there for a while, there might be a grain of truth in that theory. But that's where you get the people who go a bit OTT - there is a difference between "Kylo was influenced to a certain extent but he's still to blame for the people he killed" and "it was all Snoke and Kylo is just an innocent brainwashed bystander who is not to blame for what he did". I have seen both, and the latter is very close to "Kylo Ren did nothing wrong" - but it is definitely not the majority opinion.
People like seeing Kylo redeemed because the way he is written, it defnitely is a canon possibilty (even if it is a "redemption in death" like with Vader). I have seen massively woobiefied Kylo, but not nearly as much as there was woobiefied Loki.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-25 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)I was hoping Bloodline would help, but it blew up the "Kylo turned at 15" theory and gave us nothing else, lol.
no subject
Eh, I think they're not going to give us any real new and important background material about the new main characters before VIII comes out.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-25 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)"definitely more canon interaction"? Three or four more lines to each other isn't exactly an admirable benchmark.
And I'm sorry, but you sound very defensive and rude. Nothing in my comment was even combative.
no subject
Oh yeah, I really hate that Hollycomb fic series. But one popular fic series doesn't equal "Hux gets woobiefied across the board to the extent Loki did" - I never said it doesn't ever happen, just not nearly as often as with Loki ( considering there was da time every third to second Loki fic was either "Loki gets abused by Odin and or Thor" or "Loki gets captured and tortured/experimented on/raped") and not more than any other character in the fandom.
And if you can tell me where I called the fandom infallible I'd be much obliged- because I didn't. But compared to the other big ships, it is by far the least wanky and most chill.
I am not defensive but if you can't tell the difference between a discussion and being defensive it probably might seem this way. You made a point that didn't make sense because the comparison you made was an incorrect one. You also argued "white cock worship". I disagree on both accounts because it's untrue, plain and simple.