[ SECRET POST #3432 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3432 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Flaky Pastry]



__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/kqv1lD2.gifv
[Homestuck, gif]


__________________________________________________
















03. [SPOILERS for Fire Emblem Fates]




__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]




__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Captain America: Civil War]




__________________________________________________



















06. [WARNING for all common triggers/general discussion of triggering material]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for rape]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

The people in society with the least privilege get to decide if something is offensive. If you have societal privilege you don't get whine about your feelings.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

No.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

No to you.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[dancing_clown]

I'd say this is complete bullshit, except the people with the least privilege DO get to decide what's offensive. As do the people with the most privilege or some in-between degree of privilege. Whether anyone cares is, as it's always been, up to the individual dealing with an offended person.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

Fair enough. No-one has any obligation to listen when it's the people with the most privileged talking.

Men can be offended by mansplaining all they like. They still have to live with it, tho.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

So only the quadriplegic autistic black trans lesbian bisexuals with fibromyalgia get to decide whether something is offensive, even for things like "is [term] offensive to Asian people"? I would have guessed that generally minorities are better placed to decide whether something is offensive to them than people who are not members of that minority, but you probably know better than I do.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[diet_poison]

"lesbian bisexuals"

Re: Mansplaining debate

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Do you think no one's both? I know a Tumblr user who identifies as a lesbian bisexual invert-gendered (a non-gendered gender specifically for autistic people whose specific interest is in the Victorian era) robot who uses "aut" pronouns. If anything I toned things down for that comment.

Re: Mansplaining debate

[diet_poison]

Er, yes, I think nobody's both. "Bisexual" and "lesbian" are mutually exclusive terms because "lesbian" is by definition exclusionary of other genders than female.