case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-28 03:27 pm

[ SECRET POST #3433 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
If that's his experience of his own gender, I don't think we have any right to tell him he's wrong.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-05-30 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
So we should just let me continue to mansplain away without saying anything?

I mean we could just use the long definition of their behavior I suppose but it's a quick and easy term to describe a specific behavior (not to describe the men themselves) and I think we have a right to use it. it's just shorthand for something we're going to complain about anyway that we absolutely have the right to complain about.