[ SECRET POST #3433 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[diet_poison]

Except 1. the concept of mansplaining involves the person on the other end being female and the concept that's being explained to them being something they're supposed to know more about, whether it's the experience of being female or a field that they've studied, and 2. dethtoll is right, he's not pulling it out of his ass.

If men have "no right" to ever even talk about feminist issues we're never going to get anywhere, especially if you're trying to shut down the ones who are genuinely interested in helping. Good grief.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

Anon that DT wants to throw down a well here. I don't know the OP's gender, and I find it irrelevant.

I'm a woman. It's grating when women lecture me on feminist issues. But it's ten gazillion times worse when a man lectures me on feminist issues. It doesn't matter if DT is right; his attitude of condescension is exactly what people are referring to when they use a term like mansplaining.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[diet_poison]

It's not what I would qualify as mansplaining for reasons I already explained (did you read my comment? because you kinda just repeated what you already said with no change) so there's one data point against what you're saying (and yes, I am female). By definition gender is not irrelevant here. If you knew dethtoll were talking to a man, I guarantee you you would not be saying this. He was arguing about a concept without knowing the gender of the other person. I do not think it qualifies.

It's grating when women lecture me on feminist issues.

I'm really curious as to how you define "lecturing". because like sometimes people will disagree with you and are going to say so? you aren't the end authority on feminism, and it's a little telling that you don't think even women should be able to talk to you about it in a way you don't like.