Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-28 03:27 pm
[ SECRET POST #3433 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3433 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 03:46 am (UTC)(link)For instance, I don't know what, besides mansplaining, you would call the letter to the editor that showed up in my school's paper just before the end of the term, in which some guy argued that in the interest of fairness to trans people, we should simply do away with gendered restrooms altogether. Okay, there is a case to be made for this--but the main, uh, thrust of this guy's argument was that women were big sillies to feel unsafe sharing bathrooms with cis men. After all, only about 40 percent of SA is committed by strangers! Never mind that women who get catcalled and harassed on the street might prefer not to risk experiencing that in the bathroom--or that trans women don't feel safe sharing bathrooms with cis men either.
Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.
wow. (at the guy who wrote the letter, not at you)
Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 02:45 am (UTC)(link)