case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-29 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3434 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3434 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03. [tb]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
As someone who read and loved the book first, I agree. I never expected or wanted a perfectly faithful adaptation because the book is not the type of book that can be adapted faithfully in a watchable way. It definitely had to be different.


Unfortunately they just adapted it in an non-faithful but STILL unwatchable way. The first half of the first movie, with its expanded focus on the dwarves, seemed to be going in the right direction. Then it just...????? What happened?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt - This. I never expected the movie to be a purist adaptation of the book. That just doesn't seem realistic to me. But the changes that were made weren't good ones and the final movie in the trilogy was the worst of the bunch.