[ SECRET POST #3434 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3434 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03. [tb]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[herpymcderp]

...Pretty common line of reasoning in the structuralist view of neuroscience: all behaviour has a biological basis (i.e. the brain), and all biology has a basis in genetics. The concept usually gets referred to as "biological determinism".

If someone were to be "fundamentally" something, it would mean that whatever they are is rooted in biology and can't be changed.

This, of course, is a demonstrable fallacy even from a genetics standpoint since epigenetics investigations prove that even genes aren't a static "blueprint": rather, their expression (even in the brain!) is effected by environment, learning, and experience.