Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-30 07:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #3435 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3435 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 03:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 10:00 am (UTC)(link)deserving censure or condemnation (Google)
deserving of reproof, rebuke, or censure; blameworthy (Dictionary.com)
bringing or deserving severe rebuke or censure (Vocabulary.com)
very bad : deserving very strong criticism (Merriam-Webster)
If someone's behaviour is reprehensible, it is extremely bad or unacceptable (Cambridge English Dictionary)
Note the "severe", "very", and "extremely" in those definitions. Also "censure", ie "strong or vehement expression of disapproval".
There's a lot more nuance to the word than you've been claiming.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)Put together, every definition is saying that "reprehensible" is a very strong term.
And pfft, nope, not me. I'm (quietly) against the misuse of "literally" as emphasis.
Just like I'm against your muddying of the definition of "reprehensible".
no subject
Basically, how plausible is it that OP was using the word "reprehensible" to mean "anything, no matter how small, that hurt me"? I really don't think that's likely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject