case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-04 04:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #3440 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3440 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 79 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
This was years ago, back before they disproved that study that had people thinking beatniks were immune to rabies. Obviously in retrospect I was lucky, but they were working off the knowledge they had at the time.
kaijinscendre: (paint)

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-06-04 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really glad you were so lucky! Of course, a biting startled beatnik is less likely to be rabid than if it had attacked you unprovoked. Good think you were not in a punk habitat. They are rampant with rabies!