[ SECRET POST #3440 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3440 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 79 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

When I said extremely exaggerated, my definition =/= naturally occurring in human form. I'm thinking of cartoons like Jessica Rabbit when I say that.

In this case, the waist of the above doll is the same size as her shoulders, with wide hips. That's not normal human physiology. Same with, say, the designs of Rapunzel and Anna and Elsa in Frozen.

Celebrities like Rihanna and Leighton Meester are slim, natural pear shapes without waists that small. As for the hourglass shape, Kelly Brook and Christina Hendricks also manage to fit the bill without having a waist the size of Jessica Rabbit's.

My point was that I find unatural physiology in dolls and cartoons more offensive than accurately depicted genitalia.

As for your comment about Venus of Willendorf, I just don't even understand what you're trying to say, or to imply. ???

[(Anonymous)]

I think Anon is implying that she's an hourglass, but not a skinny hourglass.

The Venus of Willendorf looks like this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Well... I still don't get it. I know what the Venus of Willendorf is, and that female figure is an apple not an hourglass (not making a value statement about that, just saying). Nor do I get what that comparison has to do with my comment.

I was and still am talking about impossible depections of women, which OP, Venus of Willendorf-esque or not, would not fall into.