case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-05 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3441 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3441 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 65 secrets from Secret Submission Post #492.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-06 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
Essentially, that since male and female brains are different (true) and women are more emotionally biased (no), they aren't as good at making rational decisions, which voting/politics/leading require. She's perfectly willing to admit that individual women are as rational as men, but not as a gender. In her words, removing the right of women to vote wouldn't fix America, but it might help.

I could go into my counter-arguments, but I'm sure you can imagine what they are. (Okay, here's one: failing to treat someone as an individual but instead their sex IS BAD and goes against individual liberty in all forms.) She's a rational person otherwise, but weirdly just won't see it on this one issue (I have in fact convinced her of other things, just not this). We argue so much over it that we had to agree to disagree.