case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-07 05:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #3443 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3443 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(Thunderbirds Are Go! 2004 Movie)


__________________________________________________



03.
[Top Gear]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Chris Hardwick]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Dylan O’Brien]


__________________________________________________



06.
[A Little Princess by Frances Hodgson Burnett]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Orphan Black]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Captain America Civil War]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Drakengard 3]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kiznaiver]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Doogie Howser, MD]









Notes:

Early because it's going to be a late day. :c

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #492.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: sorry...

(Anonymous) 2016-06-08 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
In the case of the Stanford shitbag, the prosecutor was going for 6 years. Does that still seem excessive, given that he doesn't seem to think he did anything wrong except get drunk and do something stupid that fucked up his future prospects, and that he still sees the whole thing in terms of his life being ruined, rather than the harm he did to the woman he raped?
raspberryrain: (braids)

Re: sorry...

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2016-06-08 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think six years is unreasonable. The judge deciding to knock it down to six months is offensive in that context.

And if what you're objecting to is that Stanford people protect their own in this way, yeah, fair enough.

I've been having to rethink some stuff after this argument.