[ SECRET POST #3449 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3449 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Hmm.

[(Anonymous)]

I find it weirdly fascinating the lines we draw about justification. If they are the heroes of the story, they can basically kill and torture people as long as they are labeled as the bad guys. Now, I do think that killing in self-defense and defense of others is justified, but I'm not sure the imminent danger threshold is always reached. But I've seen "good" guys torture "bad" guys and sometimes I can understand it, though I can't condone it. Thing is, figuring out the reasons why someone would do something is interesting to me. Everybody has their reasons for the stuff they do, even if you don't understand or agree with them and I don't think there is anything wrong with exploring that as long as you don't confuse reality with fiction or headcanon with canon.

Re: Hmm.

[feotakahari]

Whether good guy torturers in fiction inspire real life torture is already something of a quagmire: http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0212/p99s01-duts.html