case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-14 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3450 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3450 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Cracked After Hours]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Disney's Sword in the Stone]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon Sun and Moon]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Charlie Hunnam)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Jodie Foster]


__________________________________________________



07.
[New Blood]


__________________________________________________



08.
[DC Rebirth]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jane the virgin / Juana la virgen]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

warning tl;dr serious answer

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-06-14 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
A complicated question, OP. A fairly large percentage of people with autism are still capable of giving consent and understanding sex and sexuality. If this is the case, then it's not unethical to have sex with someone who is autistic.

If you're talking about someone with autism who also happens to fall into category of mental retardation, that is a different question. Autism and mental retardation are not necessarily the same thing, though there does tend to be some crossover. This is also not to say that someone with a degree of retardation is incapable of giving consent! It is to say that in these cases one must carefully consider whether or not coercion or power imbalance is a factor in decision making.

There are plenty of people with mental disabilities who enter into willing, healthy, and fulfilling sexual relationships... so it's really sort of a case of needing to assess individual capabilities and boundaries.

I think the best example I've heard came from a prof I had in my first year psych classes in undergrad, where she described a couple she was counselling. Both were sub 90 IQ, one was autistic. They had been married for five years, quite happily, and were able to live together with minimal outside interference. The big question in that relationship came about when the couple wanted to consider raising children, and that's where the real discussions about competency and ability came up. They eventually, with counselling, decided that they would not conceive as it would prove too much for either of them to manage in addition to their normal routines.

To me this really shows that sex and sexuality are not that big of a deal as long as consequences are understood by all parties.

tl;dr It depends on the people in question, anon.
dancing_clown: (Default)

Re: warning tl;dr serious answer

[personal profile] dancing_clown 2016-06-15 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Good answer.