[ SECRET POST #3452 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Courage, the Cowardly Dog]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Vampire Princess Miyu]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Powerpuff Girls]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, Evelyn/Imhotep]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Orphan Black]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Lost in Translation]


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: T-Swizzle and T-Hiddles

[(Anonymous)]

That's probably because it was a TV miniseries for the BBC and not a movie. It got great reviews and was an action/espionage role where Hiddleston was the main character. Also, the woman who directed The Night Manager is shortlisted to direct the next Bond film:

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jun/01/james-bond-director-susanne-bier-night-manager

I'm not saying Hiddleston's a shoe-in, but I don't think his chances are all that hopeless. Look at Daniel Craig's film roles prior to Casino Royle, or Sean Connery's prior to Dr. No , they're not exactly overflowing with blockbusters. Darby O'Gill and the Little People, anyone?

And note: both Pierce Brosnan and Roger Moore's biggest pre-Bond roles were action/detective/espionage TV series.

Re: T-Swizzle and T-Hiddles

[herpymcderp]

I'm aware it's a miniseries. The movie blogs I read also cover other entertainment sometimes when it involves film stars... probably should have made that clear, so my bad.

And sure, it's not as though relative unknowns don't get castings (they definitely do) but at this point Hiddles is A-B list. The game has changed.

Re: T-Swizzle and T-Hiddles

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think it's changed so much that he has zero chance. When it comes to big franchises like the Bond films, they don't want a big star, but they do want someone who can fill the basic requirements. Hiddleston's in a good area. He's not a total unknown, he's young and in good physical condition (VERY important as the action sequences get more elaborate), he's got the suave manners and charm thing down, he's properly British, he's just done a very well received series that's similar but not too similar to Bond, and his schedule is not yet so booked that he can't handle a multi-picture franchise. All significant factors in his favor. This is not to say he'll absolutely get it, but they'd be fools if they didn't consider him as a contender.