[ SECRET POST #3466 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[BRÅVES- "Lovely Bones" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiTx4qufF2g)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Doctor Blake Mysteries]


__________________________________________________



04.
[fault milestone one]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. http://i.imgur.com/XFAoKt9.png
[linked for porn, animated]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #495.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[herpymcderp]

Why not? Why can't you even? Do you still think the correct course of action is to say, "No, you don't matter." to ...say... fathers who are fighting for court custody of their kids? Do you think that feminism doesn't go both ways?

Do you actually think performative masculinity doesn't hurt men, and that the patriarchy is 100% good times for everyone who is male identified?

Because see, that's where intersectionality comes in.

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[ariakas]

Not that I don't agree with your overall point, but the example of the court custody thing is a really bad one. It's something the MRM uses as a wedge issue or example of how men are discriminated against, but statistically speaking, men are actually more likely to get custody of their kids if they ask for it. Most men don't ask. This has been true since at least the 90s, so going on 30 years now.

Infuriatingly enough, one study found that one of the chief biases at play for judges' justifications of preferring the father for custody when he sought it was their (mis)perception that men are unduly discriminated against in family courts.

Like I said, I don't disagree with your overall point, but "women have an unfair advantage in custody hearings" is a outright myth that shouldn't be perpetuated. Shared custody is default unless one parent is unfit, and judges are more likely to believe fathers who declare mothers unfit than the other way around - to the detriment of the children, it would seem, in some rather infamous cases in BC of a judge simply assuming the mother was lying about abuse in order to get custody, then the father murdering the kids as soon as he gets them.

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[herpymcderp]

Consider this:

I couldn't be assed to think of a better example for someone who is 90% likely to be a troll.

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[ariakas]

Any example is better than an example which is actually an example of the opposite and a damaging social myth.

I'd go with: longer prison sentences for the same crimes as a default example of pretty obvious discrimination.

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[(Anonymous)]

so you've got nothing

Re: Do you have an obligation to be intersectional...

[herpymcderp]

I have yet to see a rebuttal from you.