case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-30 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3466 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[BRÅVES- "Lovely Bones" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiTx4qufF2g)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Doctor Blake Mysteries]


__________________________________________________



04.
[fault milestone one]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. http://i.imgur.com/XFAoKt9.png
[linked for porn, animated]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #495.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2016-07-01 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
If simply pointing out how logical people argue is trying to be a "master debater" in your eyes, well, that's...

But more importantly:

Why are you being such a dipshit yourself? I didn't see you bitching at the other anon for not providing evidence that the comments DIDN'T get deleted, that's exactly the same thing.

No, no it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the person making the positive assertion (i.e. something does exist, something did happen, as opposed to it doesn't, or didn't). If you don't like that, don't make unsubstantiated claims. At the very least, don't be offended when someone asks you to substantiate them. What you're doing is asking the other commenters to prove a negative, which is a logical fallacy - of course I wouldn't get on their cases for that. That's your bad, not theirs.

You're right, "dipshit" is a personal attack. I should have chosen: hostile, overly defensive, illogical, reactionary, or unable to express or defend your position well, as these are evidenced by your own statements.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-01 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
As soon as you brought up "You'd fail a debate automatically at this point with a simple nod to the judges" you made this into such a big deal when it isn't. So sure, you are ~simply pointing it out" without the slightest trace of condescension. You are clearly so superior.

Sure, do ignore the posted sources because you want to whine about how ~you can't say anything about them anymore~. That's alright. But this here? This is a clear case of "some people say they got their comments deleted" and someone else piping in saying something like 'no, they are lying'. So the person accusing people of lying about this has to prove that this is true just as much.

Ah yes, anyone who doesn't want to make a fandomsecrets thread into some award winning debate show is automatically illogical, unable to express their position and overly defensive. Gotcha.
And now excuse me, I have other things to do than playing ~debate~ with someone on fandomsecrets.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2016-07-01 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't say anything about the sources because a) it's like 20 pages long and I'm still reading it, and b) yes, you've absolutely poisoned the well to the point where if I do come to the conclusion that they're inaccurate or biased, there's basically no point in saying so, because you've already decided that's what everyone is going to say.

So the person accusing people of lying about this has to prove that this is true just as much.

Sure, you can make that argument now, but before you posted sources, you couldn't, as you had no form of positive evidence.

Ah yes, anyone who doesn't want to make a fandomsecrets thread into some award winning debate show is automatically illogical, unable to express their position and overly defensive.

Well, no, that's just what you've demonstrated with the way you're attempting to persuade people of your point of view. Doubling down with hyperbole and defensive sarcasm isn't helping.