case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-30 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3466 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[BRÅVES- "Lovely Bones" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiTx4qufF2g)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Doctor Blake Mysteries]


__________________________________________________



04.
[fault milestone one]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. http://i.imgur.com/XFAoKt9.png
[linked for porn, animated]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #495.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-07-01 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
"not providing evidence that the comments DIDN'T get deleted, that's exactly the same thing"

Actually, no it's not. You can't prove a negative. When an action (especially an unlikely one) is claimed, you must prove that it happened, or the most logical path to take is to assume it probably didn't. (ETA: ariakas explained this much better than I. should have read her other comments first, oops)

Also, to be really nitpicky, saying you're acting like a dipshit is commenting on your behavior, not calling you names. An ad hom attack is something more along the lines of "but you're just a moron" while not addressing any of the actual points.
Edited 2016-07-01 20:18 (UTC)