Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-07-02 03:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #3468 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3468 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Like if we talked about how ~problematic~ Snape/Neville is and analysed how writing it is perpetuating pedophilia and abuse there's going to be a very small pool of people that everyone knows we're talking about and the criticism will probably occur in a space they'll see it without seeking it out.
I also think that when it comes to fandom and such, there's not actually much importance to criticizing the media in terms of making a change. I think social change will happen, and that will pull the media after it. Overall I think that people overemphasize the legal aspects of social justice, without letting some elements remain social, and change naturally as part of social shift.
This times a million. Pushing media to change might might help speed social changes up a little, but for the most part problems in media are symptomatic of a greater disease, they're not an illness in themselves. Art is a reflection of the place, people, and circumstances it was created in.
no subject
And re: your final paragraph, it's funny because I'm actually studying literature - so in a sense, I'm doing exactly that, looking at media trends and issues on a more worldwide scale and in a more systematic way.
A perfect example of media being symptomatic imo is the whole Ghostbusters fiasco. That level of vitriol is absolutely symptomatic of social issues. I will not for a minute believe otherwise.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-03 04:48 am (UTC)(link)I think you are misreading OP here.
OP said that "certain fandoms, genres, and works have serious issues with race/gender/representation, and conversations about how to fix this are necessary."
To me, that's talking about works of media, genres of media, and fan communities that respond to media. In general, I don't read the main thrust of OP's statement as being that it's important to criticize fanfiction. When I read that it seems to me that OP is talking about the way that we talk about and respond to media, not primarily the way that we talk about and respond to fanfiction.
Using Moffat-era Who as the attached image reinforces that idea. When people talk about Moffat-era Who being problematic, they're not saying that people are writing bad fanfiction. It's a wide-ranging debate about the actual televised show Doctor Who as produced by Stephen Moffat, which a lot of people think is deeply problematic and refuse to watch, and which there are massive flaming debates about. So I read OP as referring to that kind of conversation.
Are you reading this whole thing as though OP is just talking about people who yell at fic writers?