[ SECRET POST #3468 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3468 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

What if you're hypothetically a fan of Ender's Game, for an example of a work with a fan following and a problematic author? If this fan knows Card has homophobic views and disagrees with them, but still enjoys the book, how does telling them Card is a homophobe help anything?

[ketita]

Not sure how this relates to what I said, though? Card's issues are not actually IN Ender's Game, and his issues are not that he wrote it. His issues are external to it. I was addressing the issue of catergorizing writers as "bad people" based on some not-progressive-enough thing they wrote.

[(Anonymous)]

What about a work with fairly blatant issues (i.e, a period work with blatant sexism, slurs, or racial stereotypes)?