case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-03 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #3469 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3469 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [WARNING for discussion of rape]




__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-03 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the same anon.

But you do you, Drogo fangirl and rape apologist, I guess.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-03 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
DA. You do you, inability to distinguish fact from fiction girl.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-04 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
You are part of why the phrase "rape apologist" has stopped meaning anything at all to me.

When I see it said about someone, it's just noise. Nonsense syllables. I have learned that it tells me nothing, positive or negative or neutral, about the person it's being applied to. The phrase "rape apologist" now means as much as a Canadian ending their sentence with "eh". It's a weird linguistic holdover that has an information content of zero.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-04 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
When you say things like "Drogo may be a rapist, but it's okay with his culture so we shouldn't judge him like we judge Ramsey and his relationships aren't problematic" you are literally being a rape apologist. There's no clearer definition than that.