[ SECRET POST #3474 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap]



__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/8Lfgcp8.jpg
[A Game of Thrones, Tyene Sand; link because OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Independence Day]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Queen at Arms]


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________





















06. [WARNING for underage/shota]

[Boku no Pico]


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore, torture]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2- too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

NS, NF, etc.

"actively want that kid dead"

[raspberryrain]

No.

I think it's a tragedy brought on by foolishness, like much tragedy. Is this the Stargate movie?

Re: "actively want that kid dead"

[(Anonymous)]

I think it is the Stargate movie.

It was a dumb thing to do, but probably just born of a things-that-only-happen-to-other-people carelessness and bravado. Maybe he thought he taught his kid not to do things like that well enough and assumed that meant the kid actually understood not to mess with the gun. Maybe he assumed his kid didn't know where the gun was and would never go snooping. We don't really know what he was like before all of this.

Re: "actively want that kid dead"

[(Anonymous)]

Hubris?

Re: "actively want that kid dead"

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I tend to assume stupidity, not malice.

Also, the movie came out in 1994, and my possibly-inaccurate ten minutes of internet research suggests to me that gun safes to protect children didn't gain traction until a while after that. Still stupid, but period-standard stupidity.

Re: "actively want that kid dead"

[(Anonymous)]

My dad got rid of his guns in 1986 when my mum got pregnant. He was a military man too. It's not hard.

Re: "actively want that kid dead"

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I could not take Jack's crying about his son's death seriously, because it was absolutely his fault. The show can't have Jack be an intelligent and well-trained military guy AND the kind of moron who leaves guns lying around where there's kids.

And for those saying gun safes only came around after that, my family were sporting shooters and kept everything in gun safes since before I was born, in 1981.