fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3474 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

[Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap]

__________________________________________________

02. http://i.imgur.com/8Lfgcp8.jpg
[A Game of Thrones, Tyene Sand; link because OP warned for nudity]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Independence Day]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Queen at Arms]

__________________________________________________

05. [repeat]

__________________________________________________

06. [WARNING for underage/shota]

[Boku no Pico]

__________________________________________________

07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________

08. [WARNING for incest]
[WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________

09. [WARNING for gore, torture]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2- too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

High sex drive and willingness to try almost anything (except submissive stuff, but there are lots of guys who'd rather play that role). And an active imagination, so coming up with fantasies and things to try would be easy for me.

Passion for helping people. Intelligence. I don't want kids, but I do want pets. So I'd be great for an animal loving person who doesn't want kids.

I'm bisexual. I'm nerdy. I'm a bigger girl with glasses, and there are people out there who like that. I don't care for romance, so I wouldn't expect my partner to bring me flowers or do sappy things.

Haha, I was going to say a lot of this except that I am submissive and would prefer someone who likes to play the opposite role.

[ SECRET POST #3474 ]

Re: as a corollary to yesterday's thread about your relationship requirements

Re: as a corollary to yesterday's thread about your relationship requirements