[ SECRET POST #3474 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap]



__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/8Lfgcp8.jpg
[A Game of Thrones, Tyene Sand; link because OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Independence Day]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Queen at Arms]


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________





















06. [WARNING for underage/shota]

[Boku no Pico]


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore, torture]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2- too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Simon Pegg has a fantastic rebuttal.

[(Anonymous)]

I think that trying to integrate the "Kelvin timeline" into the rest of the Trek was a mistake, possibly driven by the MMO expansion. Sulu isn't a person, he's a character in an independent derivative work. He is whatever they create. And differences in interpretation and performance are judged by whether they pay off in the end. After all, no one cares that MCU is mostly its own little interpretive oubliette. Or that we've had at least a half dozen cinematic Batmen. (Dumb idea of the night: Batman vs. Batman vs. Batman vs. Batman vs. Batman vs. Batman, with at least two of them cartoon animation.)

I have my doubts that Star Trek: Beyond will given how their reinterpretation of Khan was such a huge mess. And I think anti-funny McCoy is another sign of doing it wrong. But I won't know either way before seeing the movie.

Re: Simon Pegg has a fantastic rebuttal.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I think that trying to integrate the "Kelvin timeline" into the rest of the Trek was a mistake
Whether or not you or I or anyone else thinks it is a mistake, the fact is that they did it and thus they need to work with it as they have laid it out. At least in my opinion. As it has implications inherent in being part of the rest of Trek instead of being its own new thing.

I have my doubts that Star Trek: Beyond will given how their reinterpretation of Khan was such a huge mess. And I think anti-funny McCoy is another sign of doing it wrong. But I won't know either way before seeing the movie.
I have doubts as well. I still haven't been able to bring myself to watch the last movie because of what a mess they made of the whole thing. However, unlike you, I won't be watching the movie to make up my mind. I will find as many spoilers as possible after it is released and make up my mind based off of that. If it sounds like it is reasonable, then I will go see it. (Like I saw Captain America: Civil War despite not seeing Age of Ultron because of what a fuck-up they turned it into.)