[ SECRET POST #3481 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3481 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[person of interest]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Red/Red 2]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Evoland 2]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















07. [SPOILERS for Oxenfree]
[WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for real people death?]

[French politics]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #497.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: fictional leaders

[philstar22]

Probably a Trek captain. Because Trek is very socialist and I'm very socialist. Probably Picard even though I find TNG the least interesting of the series, Picard is the captain I'd most like to be like.

Re: fictional leaders

[(Anonymous)]

I would argue that Trek is more post-scarcity utopian than explicitly socialist. And I think the difference between those things shows up most prominently in DS9, with stuff like Sisko talking about how it's easy to be a saint in paradise, and the differences between Sisko's and Picard's attitudes despite them both being hardcore Federation.

Re: fictional leaders

[philstar22]

Okay, true. But I'd also argue that in Trek humanity is post-scarcity because of things like putting aside their differences and making peace, and being obsessed with wealth. It was meeting the Vulcans and then being part of the universe that caused humanity to become better. And by becoming better, that's when they became post-scarcity.