case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-15 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #3481 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3481 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[person of interest]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Red/Red 2]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Evoland 2]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















07. [SPOILERS for Oxenfree]
[WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for real people death?]

[French politics]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #497.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you think that they are incorrect about victimization and oppression, or that they're wrong to talk about it

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I think they have no clue what actual oppression looks like.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
In what respect do they - in general - see things as oppressive that are not at all oppressive or bad?

Particularly, where do you think this goes beyond teenagers being idiots into something more genuinely serious? And keeping in mind that the existence of a worst form of oppression does not eliminate lesser forms - it's not like lynching is fine because, well, at least there's no more slavery.

Because, like, I'll definitely agree that there are some times when people are wrong about things, but saying that it's a general trait of all the things an entire generation cares about is a really, really strong claim.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
You'd just argue with any example I could give you, and then other people would come along and call me names, so I'm bored now. You win, g'night.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, goodbye, then. Sorry if I hurt you by not agreeing with your positions. Maybe you just need to learn that the world can't protect you from everything, and toughen up about people calling you names.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe you just need to learn that the world can't protect you from everything, and toughen up about people calling you names.

That's good advice, nonny. If only more millennials would take it!

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Or if only you weren't a cowardly hypocrite fucking weasel who bitches about how millenials are all sheltered babies and then literally refuses to take part in an argument because someone might disagree with them. You child. You shithead.

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
That's the millennial spirit!

Re: "Trophy for participation"

(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
"You'd just argue with any example I could give you"

lol

sorry you don't just get to automatically be right because you said the words