Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-07-15 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #3481 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3481 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[person of interest]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Red/Red 2]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Evoland 2]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Oxenfree]
[WARNING for suicide]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for real people death?]

[French politics]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #497.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Gender Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 02:48 am (UTC)(link)*which is stupid, it's complete bullshit
Re: Gender Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 05:38 am (UTC)(link)*Janet Hardy, author of The Ethical Slut and a lot of other books, has been exploring the "girlfag" label recently, and she's an old lady who's been fighting in the sex and gender wars a long time, so I give her a lot more respect.
Re: Gender Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)In my case (not speaking for everyone, obviously), the two main options presented don't really describe me at all. I don't identify with the gender I was assigned at birth (it feels actively uncomfortable to be referred to that way), and the other main option doesn't feel "right" either (I feel awkward and out of place there).
Tbh, gender essentialism is something I've been on the receiving end of, more often than not. (Peeps telling me I "have to" wear [clothing associated with gender] because I'm supposedly [gender associated with clothing], for example.)
Not much in my immediate family though, since my mum led by example by being the only one interested in sports (rather than my dad or my brother or me), which society has deemed a "masculine" interest.
So, I don't believe that "liking dolls" or "liking pink" makes someone female, any more than "liking sports" or "liking blue" makes someone male. It may be more common, but that's likely to be more from socially-enforced "this is how you [gender]" than any sort of "this is an innate part of [gender]" (plus, of course, personal preference).
To use an analogy, it's a bit like eye colour. (Fun fact: I once had a science teacher try to convince me I was wrong about my eye colour.)
Not everyone has blue eyes or brown eyes. They're the ones presented most often, but that doesn't mean green eyes don't exist, or that hazel eyes don't exist, or that heterochromia (multicoloured eyes) doesn't exist.
Some of the terms may be a bit redundant (iirc "grey" eyes are a variation of blue eyes), like with gender, but that doesn't mean there isn't more than just the two that people always talk about.
And it definitely doesn't mean the stereotypes associated with eye colour are true.