[ SECRET POST #3487 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3487 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #498.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: TW: discussion of abuse?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Then theoretically at some point, considering infinite possibilities, there must be some circumstance or situation where punching is okay in response to some extreme magnitude of emotional abuse, right? I don't know how you can say otherwise while claiming that.

Re: TW: discussion of abuse?

[(Anonymous)]

Depends on what form the emotional abuse takes. Something like, destroying precious possessions or divulging humiliating private information would warrant punching. Calling someone hurtful things, not so much.

Re: TW: discussion of abuse?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT/OP

I would agree with that which is why I was questioning when the person I was talking to said "whoever punches first is always the one in the wrong." If both types of abuse can be equally damaging then at some point it would even out.

Re: TW: discussion of abuse?

[(Anonymous)]

Theoretically, but not practically.

Re: TW: discussion of abuse?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm fine with that distinction provided you mean "very unlikely to happen" as opposed to "would never, ever in reality." The part I was concerned with was the "punches are always worse but at the same time the abuses are equal" stance.