case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-24 03:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #3490 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3490 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 52 secrets from Secret Submission Post #499.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz

(Anonymous) 2016-07-24 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, first, I wouldn't say that I was okay with it. I wish they hadn't. I would say that I've made my peace of it and I think it's mostly just how politics is.

Second, I don't think it's accurate to say that they refused to support Bernie. Because Bernie lost. He lost the primary. They didn't stop him from winning, they didn't stop him from getting the nomination. I think it's inaccurate to blame Bernie's loss on the DNC. I mean, I wish they'd been more neutral in part because I don't think it would have made a huge difference. I don't think they would have refused to support him if he had won. Don't think he would have won.

Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz

(Anonymous) 2016-07-24 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, did you misread my comment? I said I wish they had officially refused to support Bernie on the Democratic ticket instead of lying and saying they were neutral when they weren't. I don't know how you read what I said, but I don't see how the latter half is a response.

Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz

(Anonymous) 2016-07-24 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I took the comment to mean you thought what the DNC had actually done was functionally equivalent to officially refusing to support Bernie.

I apologize if I misread you.

Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz

(Anonymous) 2016-07-24 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
No, they functionally heavily favored Hillary, but I don't think they didn't support Bernie at all. I just wish they had done what I mentioned and not even pretended to be fair.