[ SECRET POST #3495 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3495 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________

















10. [SPOILERS for Voltron: Legendary Defender]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for abuse]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #499.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

Why?

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

What do you mean, why?

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

Why is the distinction between physical and non-physical causes of harm necessary to maintain? What does it get us?

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT
Because one is a lot more severe. Being called names sucks. I well know. I have cried many, many times over being called names (including the n-word) and over being harassed. I still think it is less severe than getting beaten up or otherwise having physical violence directed at me.

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, so the distinction is necessary because physical violence is more effective at causing harm? So the distinction between violence and non-violent methods of causing harm is justified on account of the degree of harm that they cause?

Re: Words = Violence?

[a_potato]

Not ayrt, of course, but I think the distinction is justified because the type of harm is different. Violent harm causes physical damage, whereas non-violent harm does not. And even where non-violent harm leads to physical damage, it's indirect, whereas violent harm is direct.

Re: Words = Violence?

[(Anonymous)]

Because words have meaning and nuance is important?

I think most people view physical harm as more serious than non-physical harm because it poses a direct threat to one's life.