case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-31 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3497 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3497 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-08-01 09:26 am (UTC)(link)
+1

It's a ridiculous rule in the first place. There are just as many shitty betas as there are shitty writers in fandom. And the amount of fics I've seen riddled with mistakes, typos and missing words in exchanges or fests that list three and more betas in their author's notes doesn't exactly induce me to change my mind.

I'm not saying getting a beta is a bad thing. Not at all. But assuming beta = improved fic quality is sadly not true either.