[ SECRET POST #3498 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3498 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This isn't one of those "poor people should be GRATEFUL for every measley scrap they have; how dare they not care about something getting ruined!!!" comments is it?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I read it more as like... someone with less means to replace something that's been destroyed/broken is more likely to react negatively/more 'extremely' to that loss than someone who has the discretionary funds to think, "Oh I have to go get a new [object] now. Oh well."

[(Anonymous)]

It's sad, but isn't it true? As a poor person who probably couldn't afford even the simplest of repairs or even insurance I'm extra protective of the stuff I do have. Not necessarily out of sentimentality, but because if something happened to that stuff then it's gone for good. This also goes for my own health.

[(Anonymous)]

Dude, I'm poor and replacing destroyed objects is a huge deal for me. A rich person can afford to not care, a poor person can't.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

+1 I'm poor too and losing even small things upsets me because I often can't afford to replace them.