case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-01 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3498 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3498 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: "Male fantasies, male fantasies..."

[personal profile] feotakahari 2016-08-01 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
This reminds me of some of the stuff I've seen in fiction. There are some writers who recognize the male default and push back against it, often in really unsubtle ways. There are other writers who write as if they were born and raised in a parallel universe where male default never existed. This isn't the same as being feminist (Gen Urobuchi displays no recognition that male default is a thing, and he's arguably sexist against women), but I find that it can fulfill my desire for egalitarian fiction in ways that "feminist" fiction fails at.