case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-09 06:27 pm

[ SECRET POST #3506 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3506 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dollhouse]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[http://transgirlnextdoor.tumblr.com/]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #501.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Transcript by OP

(Anonymous) 2016-08-09 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt but I think you are confusing queerness with LGBT labels/identities. Queerness as a term is fair use; it describes non-straight romantic/sexual activity and feeling. If Hamilton and Laurens were sexually into one another, that's queer. Ascribing identities like "gay" or "straight" aren't appropriate, obviously, and even "bisexual" should be used with caution. Queerness isn't (or doesn't have to be) an identity - and more than that, it can aptly describe one-time encounters or situational bisexuality without forcing a sexual identity on someone. Queer is queer no matter what, no matter the age.

I agree, as I said, that you can't just look at some letters and say "well clearly Hamilton is gay" or "clearly they were boning". That doesn't mean it is am impossible assertion, and the possibility can be discussed seriously without throwing it out because a few Tumblrinas want slashfic.