case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-13 03:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #3510 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3510 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Stephen King]


__________________________________________________



03.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



04.
[American Gods]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Charlie Hunnam in King Arthur: Legend of the Sword]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Penn & Teller: Fool Us]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Steven Universe]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Questionable Content]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Ghostbusters 2016]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Based on #1/Modern Shakespeare adaptations

(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT - Me too! My literature professor loved it, as well as Titus. I wasn't about to tell him I hated both...

Re: Based on #1/Modern Shakespeare adaptations

(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
DA. Ah. I wonder if I should say then that that was the one I really liked. Admittedly more from being a Baz Luhrman fan than anything, although it's not his strongest film, but R&J was the play I did in school and one I've seen live as well, and I still enjoyed what the film did with it. I know it's very much love or hate, but it worked for me. The OTT-ness of the film in general made the language seem a more natural choice, and I liked the setting update and the 80s/90s feel. It might not have worked as well on a different play, but R&J has strong elements of melodrama and passion and OTT-ness anyway, and I thought the feud worked well in the updated context as well. A lot of the actors did quite well with the language as well, including Claire Danes who did a lot better than I expected.

But, yes. Very much a love it or hate it thing, I get that.

Re: Based on #1/Modern Shakespeare adaptations

(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT - Oh, I'm fine with you liking it! It was more that he was definitely an "agree with me, period" person. (Which made writing anything for him very frustrating.)