[ SECRET POST #3510 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3510 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Stephen King]


__________________________________________________



03.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



04.
[American Gods]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Charlie Hunnam in King Arthur: Legend of the Sword]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Penn & Teller: Fool Us]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Steven Universe]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Questionable Content]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Ghostbusters 2016]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

op

[(Anonymous)]

Not sure where you're deriving troll from. I want to see it for myself. But Sony and Feig were incredibly deceptive and sexist the way they went about the marketing that it put me off giving any money to them.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

So all the other people who worked really hard on the movie and who didn't have anything to do with what you perceive to be Fieg and Sony's "deception" don't deserve to get paid? Nice.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Different anon. I think you're making a major assumption that anyone deserves my money. If I want to make a point by not consuming a piece of media for any reason, that's my right. Teaching Sony a lesson in not insulting its audience would certainly qualify as a good reason in my book.

Mel Gibson made Passion of the Christ. He's also said anti-Semitic things, for which people chose not to watch the film, or any films he makes. Are those people also wrong because the other people who worked on it 'deserved to get paid'?

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

But that's not consuming it. As opposed to consuming it but not paying.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

so because mel gibson is an anti-semetic man, the movie crew doesn't exist suddenly?

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Where did the original poster ever say that they would consume it without paying?

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

Seriously?

"But I'll only see it when I can get it for free, because I refuse to pay [...]"

op again

[(Anonymous)]

I was thinking getting it from the library. Do you look at libraries and say that anyone consuming media from there is saying that the people behind the stuff being rented don't deserve to be paid?

Re: op

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Practically everyone except for studio financiers and a handful of people who are contracted for a cut of the gross have already been paid their union wages. This is true even if the movie goes straight to cable/DVD or not.