[ SECRET POST #3514 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3514 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Love it or List it]


__________________________________________________



07.
[ALF]


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

23 percent isn't that high, and the high percentage in the other parts of the world is more likely to have to do with other factors than owning a cat.

[(Anonymous)]

1 of 4 sounds fairly common to me.

[(Anonymous)]

How common is it if it only affects a small minority of the population? And what percentage of the 22% affected actually got it from a cat, and not one of the various other causes?

http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/toxoplasmosis/gen_info/faqs.html
http://icatcare.org/advice/cat-health/toxoplasmosis-and-cats


Research indicates that contact with cats (or owning a cat) does not increase the risk of T gondii infection in humans. Studies have shown that:

It is rare to find cats shedding oocysts in their faeces - for example one study of more than 206 cats showed nearly 25% had been infected with T gondii, but none of them were shedding oocysts in their faeces
Vets working with cats are no more likely to be infected with T gondii than the general population including people not in contact with cats
Contact with cats generally has little or no influence on the probability of people being infected with T gondii whereas consuming raw meat significantly increases the risk of acquiring infection
Stroking a cat will not spread infection from cats to people (even when shedding oocysts in their faeces, oocysts cannot be found in the cat's coat)
The risk of infection from cats is very low, except in young children playing in soil contaminated with sporulated oocysts
Most people are probably infected through ingestion of undercooked meat – especially goat, mutton and pork
Newer strains of T gondii have been identified that are highly contagious, with infection being efficiently passed between intermediate hosts (species other than cats). Consequently, some scientists think that cats are becoming less important in the spread of this infection.

[kallanda_lee]

Wait, what? That's insanely high for an infection in a population.

[(Anonymous)]

Less than a quarter is insanely high?

[kallanda_lee]

a quarter of a population? For an infection? Yes, that's huge - imagine if it were lethal. I mean, only a few thing surpass hat, like herpes.

[(Anonymous)]

jts still misleading to say that it's common for cat owners (when you're more likely to get it from eating raw meat) and that it makes them crazy (when most people who have it don't show any symptoms)