case: ([ Mori; ...? ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-04-07 11:56 pm

(no subject)

"Dear LiveJournal user technophile,

We have received a report, properly formatted under the provisions set forth by United States law, indicating that your entry located at http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/141092.html violates the copyright of another person. As such, we must request that you remove that entry in its entirety as soon as possible, but no later than 0:01 AM EDT, Apr 11, 2008, to avoid further action against your account.

If you feel that this report is in error and that your use of the material is allowed under copyright law, you are entitled to file a counter-notification, also under the provisions of US law; please contact us for information on how to do this. Filing a counter-notification indicates that you are willing to defend yourself in a court of law against a claim of copyright infringement.

Regards,
Douglas
LiveJournal Abuse Prevention Team"


So. Thoughts? Comply Y/N? Personally I think "hey, mind removing this secret for copyright reasons?" would've worked far better, but that's just me.

ETA:

Is there any way you could tell me which is the offending picture? If it's possible to just remove the one picture (or multiple pictures) that was reported as copyright infringement instead of the whole entry, that would be great.

Thanks,
Case


ETA 2:

Dear LiveJournal user technophile,

Thank you for your inquiry. However, once a work is reported as a copyright infringement (in our case, a LiveJournal entry or comment), US federal law requires us to remove the entire work from our servers. The law does not give us the ability to allow the removal of part of a work and then declare that it is no longer in violation of another person's copyright, as it we do not have the legal authority to determine whether a violation has occurred.

Unfortunately, as a result, we have to require the elimination of the entire entry in order to ensure that we comply fully with US law.

Regards,
Douglas
LiveJournal Abuse Prevention Team


Sorry, the thing is this is a case kind of like with LJSecret (a community where mods post anonymously made and submitted secrets created by watchers of the community i.e. we don't create the images ourselves). The post in question contains a lot of images, any of which could be the one reported as infringing on copyright. I have no problems with deleting the entire post, but in order to make sure we don't do this again, we'd have to know which one was the offending image and how. Is there any way you could give me more information on that?

Thanks again,
Case

ETA3:

Dear LiveJournal user technophile,

Our privacy policy ensures that all requests made to the Abuse Team are confidential in nature. Because of this, we cannot disclose who contacted us or the content of their complaint. Please be assured that their notification was verified as complete and accurate before we took the step of contacting you.

The safest way to ensure this does not occur again in the future is to avoid copying any material which you do not have explicit written permission to copy. This includes, but is not limited to: screenshots of web pages, including the journals of other users, text or images from other web sites, and scanned images from magazines or other publications. Generally, these are all protected by copyright law, and if we receive a report that they have been copied without permission, we are required under US law to remove them from our servers as soon as possible.

Regards,
Douglas
LiveJournal Abuse Prevention Team

So I guess if anyone wants to save the epic post:



fdjhfjh

[identity profile] shinga.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
What the fuck??
got_swagger: (Default)

[personal profile] got_swagger 2008-04-10 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
IAWTC.

(no subject)

[identity profile] batmarg.livejournal.com - 2008-04-10 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] seiberwing.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
Call back and ask them exactly which it was? I have no clue how these things work.
olesia: (Default)

[personal profile] olesia 2008-04-08 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
I hope it's over the Solitaire secret. Because that'd be the most hilarious breach of copyright ever.

[identity profile] perv.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
agreed.

[identity profile] libbyish.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
What is it in that one entry, compared to all the others, that violates copyright?

[identity profile] powercorrupts.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
Someone who holds a copyright didn't like a secret that someone made using some material that they created. They filed it with LJ Abuse properly as the copyright holder, and LJ Abuse had to recognize that.

It's just that in no other secret has anyone raised a shitfit when their art or writing or photos were used in a secret. Most people probably figured it wasn't worth it, even if the secret was using their own materials to insult them. Apparently someone decided otherwise.

[identity profile] tatooine.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
I can't tell which secret is violating copyright, but it's probably not worth the battle. Just delete it.

[identity profile] mojotmonkey.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
...tee eff?

I agree with others, though. It's not worth the wank.

[identity profile] chwheeler.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
I'd remove it just because they said so, but what I want to know is which secret got reported?

If they're honestly going to whine about copyright law, they're at the WRONG website.

[identity profile] powercorrupts.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
LJ's abuse team requires a lot of formality with copyright abuse.

Would sure be nice if they would mention WHAT violates copyright, though. I mean... most of that entry technically violates copyright in some way, I'd figure, but the issue is what you've been called on. Having to remove all the secrets would be kind of fail.

[identity profile] i-trust-snape.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yah, I say just delete it. Gotta pick your battles and all that. Although I am really curious now as to which one is violating the copyright.

[identity profile] okay.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
you're just copying and pasting images and thus looking over what's possibly a fandom secret and what's not. I agree, if it's not worth the battle, go ahead and remove it. Better save yourself some drama/wank that might come with it?

[identity profile] oneinnabun.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Which one's the copyright violation? They probably should've been more specific.

[identity profile] facets.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
lol wut. ಠ_ಠ

they could've at least specified which secret it was so you can just remove it. reply back and ask them wtf.

maybe it's a butthurt fanartist or something.

[identity profile] defaced.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Thats just fucked up..

[identity profile] interstellar.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Comply, and find out which it is so you can make it against the rules for anyone to use that image again.

[identity profile] kirarakim.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
Now I am really curious to know which secret.

[identity profile] offensive.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm assuming it's the secret with the Trunks/Gohan (uncredited, although the artist tag is still in place) fanart. But really old post is old, and it's so not worth the fight, especially since you'd be the one who got dinged for it and you weren't the one who created the secret.

[identity profile] chwheeler.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think you can copyright fanart. Considering the thing you are drawing is already copyrighted. Any lawyers in the house?

OBJECTION!

(Anonymous) - 2008-04-08 04:44 (UTC) - Expand

See icon.

[identity profile] rationelle.livejournal.com - 2008-04-08 07:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fangirlism - 2008-04-08 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] zidane.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
I would think that secrets easily fall under "Fair Use" but hey, it's your call whether you want to fight that fight or not.

[identity profile] lunarkitten.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
I'd delete it, but I'd email them back and ask which one it was that violated copyright. They're not likely to respond, but it's worth a try.

[identity profile] last-archangel.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
I bet it's 29 because only Disney would be that anal retentive.

[identity profile] terrie.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
probably not, as there is also a little mermaid secret in that post, and there have been other disney secrets too. also, that is not even official art, so.

[identity profile] robohomo.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
Ask if you can just remove the specific secret. If they say no, don't bother fighting, it's just one post, no big deal?

[identity profile] fools-game.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
Christ, another one?

http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_lounge/695614.html

This post discusses another user who received a similar notive a couple of days ago.

[identity profile] kniggit-slash.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
As much as I hate it, I would say delete.

Don't know why they can't just say "It is number blah blah, please delete kthanx."

[identity profile] hako-neko.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Ask which one it concerns and then delete that one specifically. The whole entry being deleted isn't worth it, incase the same image gets reposted down the line.

[identity profile] valorously.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:10 am (UTC)(link)



Just... fuck the what? I hate to say "comply" but idk. I'm trying to imagine [livejournal.com profile] fandomsecrets... in court! It might possibly be gayer than Phoenix Wright.

[identity profile] torificus.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
SOMEONE SHOULD WRITE THIS FIC.

(no subject)

[personal profile] xenoglossy - 2008-04-08 06:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] karel - 2008-04-08 17:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] shinraisei.livejournal.com - 2008-04-09 02:53 (UTC) - Expand
cyanglow: (sweatdrop)

[personal profile] cyanglow 2008-04-08 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah I'd love to know which one it was. It would be hilarious if it were #77.

Also couldn't they just, you know, check the image url and contact the site it is hosted on? Oh wait nevermind, too much work for them.

Page 1 of 6