case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-19 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #3516 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3516 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________





The entire rest of this post is either spoilers or have content warnings.





02. [SPOILERS for Over the Hills and Far Away]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Pokemon Sun and Moon]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Inside]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for The Girl With All The Gifts]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]
[WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for non-con]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for suicide]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Wank Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-08-20 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
SHIT U GOT ME

A) The whole "picking sides" thing is contrived drama but I think they actually did a great job of balancing between the two sides.

B) I think Tony is absolutely right: unchecked power is always dangerous, the Avengers' unchecked power has historically proven to be dangerous (in terms of body count and financial damage, every bit as dangerous as those evil governments, frankly), and even aside from that it's better if they have a say in the limits put on them rather than getting rounded up and smashed out later.

C) First of all, the filmmakers literally had to find a way to put Spiderman in for money reasons, so like. At the end of the day you have to factor that in. But aside from *that* Tony's attitude is very clear: the tragedy of the other kid's death was that he was uninvolved, innocent, a civilian, not that he was a kid (was he even a kid? I thought he was at college). It's really clear in the movies that Tony doesn't really distinguish kids from adults (which makes sense, given his own childhood), but he takes the distinction between soldiers and civilians VERY seriously. It's fair to still criticize him, but within his own terms recruiting Peter really isn't as hypocritical as everyone acts like it is.

/rant over

Re: Wank Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-08-20 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Are you implying that Tony "We're not soldiers" Stark thinks a teenage boy is a soldier??

Re: Wank Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-08-20 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
But they didn't have a say in the limits. The Accords were written before they were involved. And you don't sign a contract in the hopes you can change it LATER. Any lawyer would think you are an idiot to do that.

Re: Wank Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-08-20 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
NA

Plus, we don't know what all was in the Accords, either. That document was at least an inch thick. A lot of creepy things can be buried in the fine print.